Park Adula Intervention 21 02 11 (R. 6421) for the group League of Ticino
This report there are two aspects of political depth and little, if considered, lead us to a clear and unique conclusion.
The first aspect is clear from
basic choice.
If we consider that in principle the creation of a park can be an opportunity for the development of a region, attention should be given the choice of the park, as the Law offers types with very different accents. In this particular case must therefore be weighed carefully what type of park National is the best value for Blenio Valley, where bride and groom the best area, its reality, its culture, its history, the people who work there.
• The National type consists of vast territories in essentially natural and has three main objectives: the protection of ecosystems, which need to evolve freely, the supply of recreation and educational opportunities to the population, promotion of scientific research on the indigenous fauna and flora and natural processes;
• The type regional nature, which includes vast rural areas noteworthy and inhabited by man. It contributes effectively to the creation of conditions conducive to sustainable development, environmental education, the discovery of the natural and the culture, as well as the promotion of innovative technologies and environmentally friendly;
With regard to the side of the Ticino Adula Park, the area affected is the Blenio Valley. For those who know the reality of Blenio valley, from the definitions mentioned above it is clear that this region, should it deem it necessary to establish a park, this region of the bride for thinking of those who live there and the real situation that takes place, only one and a park significance of national regional nature of the type. It's a Valley that there are still 26% of the population in the primary and is running a strong land management units in residential areas creates a landscape certainly worthy of note. Thanks to these features are becoming increasingly rare, quality management of land and traditional architecture, this is a region where over time be able to pass on these aspects of competition, will enjoy very attractive. If we consider from this point of view the areas that the other three regions involved in the project Adula provide no comparison with Part of Ticino.
Some national studies have shown that the current national park Engadine that has existed for a hundred years has brought economic benefits to the region in particular because there are already major-care facilities. In the project the park Adula care facilities are located on the edge of the regions of Surselva and not from us.
A further completion of the message of the report, always on the choice of fund, it is important to note that the idea of \u200b\u200bcreating a national park Adula was born in 2000 in response to a contest ProNature that put on the table prizes. A contest that they joined six or seven regions of Switzerland. Today is the only race in the Ticino Park project and perhaps Adula with the draft of the Locarno Park.
Meanwhile at the national level have been recognized three other parks of national importance to the type of regional nature, and stood as candidates, next to the project Adula, the only type national, well the other 14 regional natural kind. Maybe we should learn something from the rest of the Swiss when it comes to making their business is very good.
should also be noted that the park project Adula logically, naturally, does not find particular support from the people of the valley in 2009 when the municipalities were called to a first decision, was saved from an almost moribund, via a letter from the Deputy Director of BAFU (FOEN). Letter that deserves an award for special artistic talents in the Menara bush. It may sound like a project of exquisite territorial aspect that you would like pushed from below, and games on legal hair-splitting interpretations of ordinances and obscures the clear, unambiguous intention of the legislature that it is apparent from the aforementioned definitions of the types of proposed park .
It would seem that this project is most desired by the Cantonal BAFU and that the people of the Valley Blenio, which for them are artists, but also history in managing the land, to create unique products, to create biodiversity through working with nature, and at the times of were among the best craftsmen in the main cities in Europe along with other local artists from other valleys. This rich history and who collects an inheritance is clearly not the mentality of the bride park with national priority, which is subject to the safeguard and protect, and where only one man seems uncomfortable presence and negative towards nature.
In this context, we risk endorsing this credit to waste time Blenio Valley! not throw to the winds of 5 years and public transport to get the vote then to have to acknowledge that in fact you could tell it was ten years ago, namely that if we make a park of national importance in the Valley Blenio is the only acceptable type of regional nature.
The second aspect of the political significance of this claim which is not apparent in the discussion is linked to relations with the Canton Bern.
From Bern we receive too many negative signals from the usual offices and detrimental to our culture, our history and our authority. Think of the rustic theme. Think of the current arrangement of no way for agricultural Leontica of where to gain access to federal subsidies, now also check the request to restore the "abuses" of rustic. This could be the un'avvisaglia smash that drag on for years if the PUC-PEIP should be "welcomed magnanimously" withdrawing the action from Berne. Then think to the constraints and delays that the project is being reset to the center of cross-country Campra.
An anecdote alone speaks volumes. is indelible arrogance and audacity of BAFU against Ticino when some years ago to an inch of chamois horns granted by the Security Council, immediately and without thinking too much on his knees BAFU the Security Council by threatening to cut three million grant to the forests.
Still on the theme parks, the plan Magadino, with the support of the cantonal administration offices, we are extending the tentacles of BAFU designed to take this valuable territory.
It is time to restore balance and a respectful healthy attitudes toward nature and respectful of our origins.
degenerated This relational aspect with the federal administration, if we have a little 'pride, should lead us to say to shelve the project Adula park and other similar projects that promote sterile prohibitions, that are more a symptom of decline of craft skills of human progress.
For issues raised here that do nothing but demonstrate a basic choice of the wrong type of park, which clashes with the reality of a census in the Valley and bring Blenio myths in our self-appointed guardians advice of Bern, we believe that the Valley Blenio spouses, if anything, promoted a national park value of the type in which the regional nature of the project once again on the man, his history and culture and its craft skills aimed at creating real added value.
For the Group League of Ticino Cleto Ferrari
0 comments:
Post a Comment